Lara Croft the one woman who brought sexy back to the virtual dig-site. And now she's at it again.
But the number one question on everybodys mind is, how dose it match up to the other Tomb Raider's.
It keeps the flavor of prime Lara Croft from let's say Anniversary, but if fails as a sequel. Underworld is the much antisapated sequel to Tomb Raider: Legend, which had a more relistic plot-line and made you feel you're there in a good action movie, and kept you right along with the plot. However in Underworld everything changes durasticaly and the game gives off a sence of un-reality, leaving you saying "Yeah Right!" So it fails as being a sequel, how dose it measure up on other things?
GAMEPLAY:
The gameplay for Underworld is relitivly normal to the others, with a few new things here and there. You do get to wield you're two pistols, however it isn't somthing really remarkable, and get's kinda boring. You get your grapple hook (new since Ledgend) Your dual guns. And some other weapons you collect along the way. you can, however, change Lara's outfits at the beggining of the mission, you can choose from three ( or two wetsuits during water missions).
Warning: However, the camera's are different (in PS3)and the tend to give me massive headaches. So I hope you don't have that proberlem with the game.
GRAPHIC'S:
The best part of the game is undoubtbly the graphic's. there are beautiful, and is some of the best graphic's I've seen a PS3 game so far. Except for the charictars, mercenaries, wildlife. they are pretty same-old stuff.
The game dose have the 'flavor' of a Lara Croft game. It is not a good sequel because it didn't keep the Legend feel that would have made the game a hell of alot better. to anyone out there, if a game sequelizes KEEP THE SAME FLAVOR AS THE THING YOU ARE SEQUELING! or it will end up like a flop.
JRF01...
Get more detail about Tomb Raider: Underworld.
No comments:
Post a Comment